Reconciliation Of Autonomy And Legitimate Authority Philosophy Essay

Reconciliation Of Autonomy And Legitimate Authority Philosophy Essay Political thought is deeply divided about the relationship between the individual and the community. The problem of the reconciliation of autonomy and legitimate authority is a moral one. Either I possess and am obliged to maintain my authority or I am not. Either I am totally part of my community and am obliged to serve it or I am not. Nobody ever doubted that in order to submit to some sort of authority it is necessary to sacrifice some of a persons personal autonomy  [2]  . However, many theorists argue that autonomy and the duty to obey someones commands can never co-exist. The greatest supporter of this conflict between authority and autonomy among the years has been Robert Paul Wolff. In his work In Defense of Anarchism he has insisted that there can never be a resolution between the conflict of autonomy and authority and that the only justifiable political system in virtue of autonomy is anarchism. But what exactly do these notions mean and how far is it true that the two theories can never be compatible? The Issue of Autonomy Autonomy is the right of a person to be free and the ability to choose his own actions without any constraints. For Wolff the fundamental assumption of moral philosophy is that men are responsible for their actions  [3]  . This responsibility means that a person should be responsible for taking the final decision for what she should do. Therefore, the autonomous person being autonomous does not accept commands from anyone and does not recognize any authority over him by anyone. His acts are based on his independent assessment of the situation and on nobody elses orders; has a self-regulating capacity and has a duty to take control of ones conduct. This responsibility of action means that people are metaphysically free and therefore the maintenance of autonomy is a duty. Non-interference is the most important element in political autonomy. In fact, Gaus specifies that the fundamental liberal principle is that all interferences with action stand in need of justification  [4]  . The idea of individual liberty for anarchists is inseparable fused with the theological doctrine that man has free will and can chose good or evil. Bakunin  [5]  defined freedom as following ones own reason and understanding justice. Therefore, law is rejected by anarchists because it is based on a false conception of free will and it usurps individual reason and morality. How far this statement is correct will be discussed later. The Issue of Political Obligation The central concept of political science is that of the state  [6]  . State legitimacy (or authority) is viewed as the logical correlate of the obligation of citizens to obey the law (or the state). This obligation is usually referred to as political obligation. Several questions arise from the issue of political obligation such as whether there is actually a prima facie obligation to obey the rules or why should we obey the law in general. However, this analysis is not the purpose of this essay and therefore these issues will not be further analyzed. An obligation is a requirement or duty to act in a particular way. The possession of a right usually places someone else under an obligation to uphold or respect that right  [7]  . The only theorists who are willing to reject completely the notion of political obligation are philosophical anarchists who insist on absolute respect for autonomy. Political obligation is a presumptive moral duty placed upon each and every individual in a given territory to obey all the laws enacted by the political institutions ruling the country. Political and legal institutions are authoritative institutions. Authority is the right to command, namely to order and therefore the right to be obeyed  [8]  ; it is the right to tell someone what to believe and how to act. The Conflict Theorists who support the conflict between autonomy and authority base their view on the fact that freedom is subordinated to an authority which creates regulations meant for protecting the bigger society. Therefore, people have to follow certain organizational ethics which may not be similar to their personal ethics. In order to have autonomy, individuals would just have to resort to choosing a company which holds values similar to their own. Taking responsibility means making the final decision about what to do, therefore there is no such thing as a command for the autonomous person. Political authority runs along with obligation to obey its rules, to follow it and disregard free will. But is this really true? There is a claim that political authority aims to impose its own judgement upon ours and that is illegitimate. When our judgment is incompatible with the law then, there is no obligation to obey the law and therefore, there can be no authority upon us. As long as a man fulfil ls his obligation to make himself the author of his decisions he will not accept any authority over him therefore, he will deny that he has a duty to obey the laws of the state simply because they are the laws. It has been said that we have the capacity to choose how to act. Still, this is not enough for one to take responsibility for his actions. Obligation to take responsibility for ones actions does not derive from the actors freedom of choice. Only because the actor has the capacity to reason about his choices can be said that he is held under a continuous obligation to take responsibility for them. For Kant moral autonomy is a combination of freedom and responsibility  [9]  . Hence a responsible person is bound by any moral constraints he only should be the judge of them. It is possible to listen to the advice of others but in the end he will make the decision on his own by making sure for himself that it is a good advice  [10]  . Therefore, there may be moral reasons for obeying the law but this does not imply a duty to obey the laws just because they are the laws. It rather shows a prima facie duty to obey the laws like that of keeping promises. The Anarchists Argument Following the neo-Kantian argument that people have a responsibility and a duty to act autonomously, political obligation is consistently illegitimate because it claims to replace any individual judgment. Kant supported that private judgment is more important than anything else and the welfare of single individuals should be above the need for some sort of authority. Based on this argument Robert Wolff in his work In Defense of Anarchism analyses the issue of how can moral autonomy ever be made compatible with political authority. He concludes that no comprehensive claim to political authority can be justified since it is incompatible with the requirement to act autonomously. Therefore according to Wolff, autonomy and political authority are genuinely incompatible. Yet, Kant himself does not imply in his use of the word autonomy any denial of the authoritativeness of the law. Wolff believes that the most appropriate model of society is where there are mutual agreements between indivi duals who are doing something because they want to do it and not by submitting to authority. Anarchism opposes the belief that authority and hierarchy are necessary in social relationships and argues for a society where authority and hierarchy are not needed. The most basic distinction between anarchist theories is that between a priori anarchism, which maintains that all possible states are morally illegitimate and a posteriori anarchism, which maintains that while all existing state are illegitimate this is not because it is impossible for there to be a legitimate state  [11]  . There are two forms of anarchism. Political anarchism is divided into anarcho-collectivism, which focuses on the basic criteria of justice such as equality, fraternity and solidarity, and anarcho- individualism supports individual sovereignty and insists that no institution is entitled to restrict individual freedom. On the other hand philosophical anarchism does not only attack the state but follows the view that the very idea of legitimate political authority is inexistent. Therefore, no huma n being can rightfully exercise any authority over another individual and everyone should act based on their assessment of the situation. Wolffs philosophical anarchism supports that no authority possessed by a de facto authority is legitimate and therefore there is no way to establish any political obligation  [12]  . Anarchists attack the idea of legitimate authority in order to satisfy the statement of no compatibility. Wolffs version of philosophical anarchism is a good example of a priori anarchism. Wolff maintains that the authority which states must exercise is inconsistent with the autonomy of individuals that any legitimate state would have to respect  [13]  . They would have to comply with the law because it is the law but when someone complies with the law because it is the law then he forfeits his moral freedom; the liberty that each of us has to make his own mind about what he ought to do. Hence, the concept of a de jure legitimate state would appear to be vacuous  [14]  . Anarchist judgments of state illegitimacy are typically taken to entail that subjects of those illegitimate states have no political obligations. Accordingly, all subjects of all states are at moral liberty to treat laws as non-binding and governments as non-authoritative  [15]  . Anarchists reach the con clusion that no government can be legitimate. Either we must be anarchists, or we must surrender our autonomy to whatever authority seems best at the moment. On Wolffs view contractual democracies are legitimate states but they gain their legitimacy through their citizens sacrifice of their autonomy. Henry Thoreau insisted that no individual should sacrifice his or her conscience to the judgment of politicians, elected or otherwise. This position denies that government can ever exercise rightful authority over the individual. In fact for Wolff no government is inherently or a priori better than another one, therefore, there is no reason why people should prefer a democracy to a dictatorship. In either case they lose their autonomy  [16]  . However, this view is not supported by everyone. As mentioned above doing something because it is the law (like arguing for a prima facie obligation to obey the law) is not sufficient reason of obedience. Then how about democracy? In a democratic society the citizen is both law giver and law maker, therefore autonomy is preserved as it is the citizen who authorizes the laws to which later he is required to submit to  [17]  . Wolff claims that democracy has no claim in the conflict because the person who finds himself in the minority rejects the alternative [when he voted] to find it forced upon him by a superior power. His will to be autonomous is frustrated because the will of the majority is placed upon him. However, the individual may recognize a moral obligation to obey the law but consider it to be a prima facie obligation. Since he reserves to himself in every case the decision whether the prima facie obligation is conclusive, then it can be said that he has reserved to himself the final decision as to whether to cooperat e  [18]  . On the other hand, Robert Nozick in his work Anarchy, State and Utopia welcomes an argument in favour of a minimal state  limited to the narrow functions of protection against theft, fraud, enforcement of contracts, and so on. When a State takes on more responsibilities than these, Nozick says, rights will be violated.  In an effort  to  make a case for  the idea of a minimal State, Nozick illustrates that the minimalist State arises naturally from anarchy and that any expansion of State power  beyond this minimalist threshold is unjustified.   Legitimate authority and political obligation are considered to be two sides of the same coin. For a state to be legitimate means that it has the right to issue and enforce directives. However, this is only possible if citizens are under a political obligation. As Simmons stated, if citizens do not have a prima facie obligation to obey the law then their governments do not have a right to promulgate and enforce it  [19]  . However, it does not follow that when a person is under political obligation that he should always obey the law. If this political obligation is prima facie then, does not this mean that moral considerations should always be taken into account when assessing the right course of action? If this is acceptable then there is not necessarily a conflict between political obligation and free will as a person must take into account his own considerations. One can have strong moral reasons for complying with directives issued by his government without owing any obligati ons to that government. But if we suppose that political obligation does not exist then what follows? A person can have moral constraints but as an autonomous man he should be the one deciding on these constraints. For example he can do what someone tells him but not because he told him; he must not submit to the will of others. In the same sense he may obey the law but not because it is the law  [20]  . The duty to support the commonwealth implies a state of servitude which essentially is the requirement to obey commands, the nature of which is not known at the time the obligation is undertaken  [21]  . John Stuart Mill in his work On Liberty asserted that the only purpose for which power can rightfully be exercised over any member of a civilised community against his will is to prevent harm to other  [22]  . In Mills view the law has no right to interfere with self-regarding actions; in his realm individuals are entitled to exercise unrestrained liberty. Lord Acton in his essays stated that liberty alone demands for its realization the limitation of public authority, fo r liberty is the only object which benefits all alike and provokes sincere opposition. Of course he was not an anarchist and this distinction is obvious as he speaks of limiting authority; an anarchist would speak of abolishing authority. When Wolff says constrained only by the dictated of his own will he means bound only by any prior commitments. Bakunin, an anarchist, stresses that the absence of any restraints or interferences is essential to liberty; that a persons human right consist in not obeying any other human being and not allow his actions to be determined by anyone but his own convictions  [23]  . For him the state is the evil but it was historically necessary. Socrates suggested that there is a need to obey the commands (laws) of the polis. The commonwealth made Socrates free and he was arguing that he had a duty not to destroy or injure institutions which had made him free. However, even if the state made him free some flexibility is required by an institution in order for the individual to learn making the right choices and look for alternatives. Socrates argued that the duty to be autonomous and take responsibility for our actions does not abrogate our duty to be loyal to the state. Instead, our du ty of loyalty to the laws is valid only if our duty to be autonomous is. However, as long as the sphere of authority expands, liberty is necessarily constrained. Authority can be seen as a threat to reason and critical understanding since it demands unconditional, unquestioning obedience  [24]  . The critics and a solution to the problem There are a number of critics who have argued that there is no necessary conflict between autonomy and authority. According to these critics, a morally autonomous individual takes responsibility for his actions by entering a reflective process in which he takes the final decision. But, individuals can still do this and then decide that they ought to follow the legitimate authorities. Therefore, there is no necessary conflict between the two. Plamenatz argued about a solution of the conflict  [25]  . He gave a modern version of consent as justification of political obligation. More concretely, he argued that in voting people consent to obey whoever is elected and that a vote constitutes a promise of obedience to the next government. Therefore, basically he argued for free will in deciding who to vote and taking responsibility of actions by accepting the result of the voting. An argument against this theory would be that it is irrational to consent in advance to whatever a government might do unless it was strictly specified in a manifesto whose terms would not be exceeded  [26]  . By accepting the democratic system Plamenatz argues people also undertake the obligation to obey a government they have not voted for. Some could argue that it would be better to have free conscience rather than voting. The consent theory tries to make political obligation a result of free choice but then it over-interprets our act as vo ters to fill us with extensive moral obligations  [27]  . Joseph Raz argues than an individual could have a duty to obey the law without having been bound himself to obey it. He argues that a person would have a duty to obey the law if it is most likely that he would do what he ought by obeying the law rather than following his independent judgment  [28]  . However, by doing this it is not necessarily taking responsibility of his action but rather following someone else abdicated responsibility for his own actions  [29]  . Individuals should act autonomously and since obeying someone else means he sees himself and his actions as someone elses responsibility, then someone would assume that no one could have a duty to obey anyone else. On the other hand, it could be argued that, this argument is not entirely correct. While someone obeying the law in this way is not exactly acting autonomously in doing so he may act responsibly. Although the individual does not judge for himself what the right thing to do is, he may judge if he should obey the law because by doing that he will be able to come closer to doing what he ought to do. Therefore, one could conclude that, a responsible subject follows the law not only for moral reasons but also as a result of his own deliberation  [30]  . Wolff, as well as other anarchists, would argue that by acting against your own evaluations is like doing what you believe to be wrong and that is impermissible. However, since any judgment about what to do rely on judgments about the likely consequences of ones possible actions, one may regard others as more competent than oneself at determining the consequences. Since he regards other evaluations better than his own then, one may rea sonably act on these instead of his own. Therefore, it is reasonable for an individual to obey someone elses dictates (i.e. the states) when they conflict with his own judgment. Otherwise, would it mean that when there is a clash between the demands of the state and the private interests or moral convictions of the people that disobedience should occur  [31]  ? Rawls in his work A theory of Justice he stated that sometimes civil disobedience may be justified since it depends upon the theory of political obligation  [32]  . There is an obligation to support just and efficient institutions which arises from our voluntary acts. Rawls assumes the social contract as a basis of political obligation and expresses that principles of justice should be those which free and rational men would agree to in an original position of equal liberty. Civil disobedience is non-violent and is justified as an attempt addressed to those holding the political power to correct any injustice. The exercise of authority is only appropriate when exercised in accordance with a constitution capable of being reasonably endorsed by the citizens. So can moral autonomy be compatible with political authority? Can the conflict be resolved and a solution be found? Since authority is the right to command and be obeyed and autonomy is the capacity to self-regulate ones actions there seems to be no compatibility between them. For Rousseau, human beings want to be free but at the same time they want the benefits of living in a society. But is it possible to find a form of association that defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate and by means of uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before?  [33]   For Rousseau his theory of Social Contract is a solution for this conflict. Since the whole citizen is the sovereign it cannot have any interests contrary to the interests of the individuals who comprise it.  [34]  Jeffrey Reiman in an attempt to prove Wolff wrong by arguing for the legitimacy of classical democracy, he also supports the social contract arg ument. Classical anarchists such as Proudhon, Bakunin and Kropotkin rejected the claims of political obligation; however, they recognized that a healthy society demands sociable, cooperative and respectful behaviour from its members  [35]  . Jean-Jacques Rousseau viewed democracy as the most important means through which humans can achieve freedom or autonomy in the sense of obedience to a law one subscribes to oneself  [36]  . He insisted that citizens are only free when they participate directly and continuously in their communities. Individuals are only free when they make the laws which they obey. Is the conflict and incompatibility real? In conclusion, it appears that when autonomy is the duty of free will and responsibility of actions and political obligation is the duty to obey the law and therefore the obligatory imposition of rules upon citizens, there can be no co-existence between the two. By being autonomous it means to not accept any form of authority upon you and therefore no authority can be seen to be legitimate. Although, anarchists support this idea, many theorists are of the view that there can be compatibility between the two even if a level of autonomy needs to be sacrificed in order to accept authority and ensure security. If a state was not necessary then it would not have been created since every state is the creation of man. Political obligation is only a theory developed in order for a state to exist and function in a proper way. When even the greatest supporters of the conflict between the two theories such as Wolff depart from this long-supported theory of antinomy  [37]  it seems difficul t to support this anarchistic view of incompatibility and it is considered as an over-exaggeration of the issue.

Iris By the Goo Goi dolls

And I'd give up forever to touch you ‘Cause I know that you feel me somehow You're the closest to heaven that I'll ever be And I don't want go home right now And all I can taste is this moment And all I can breathe is your life When sooner or later it's over I Just don't want miss you tonight And I don't want the world to see me ‘Cause I don't think that they'd understand When everything made to be broken I Just want you to know who I am And you can't fight the tears that mint coming Or the moment of truth in your lies When everything feels like the moviesIris was written by the and John Organize. John Organize was approached to write a song for the movie City of Angels soundtrack, and so he wrote â€Å"Iris†. This song propelled the band to stardom, as it stayed on top of Billboard Hot 100 Airplay charts for a record-breaking 18 weeks, and was nominated for three Grammas that year.According to several Interviews with Rezoned, he was experiencing serious sessions o f writer's block when he was asked to write , and was about to quit the band Just days before he wrote the song that would launch the band to worldwide fame-The song was released on April 7, 1998. Consider the song to be a part of the genre pop rock. It is slow in the verses but speeds up in the chorus. It has strong guitar and drum sounds which give it the rock feel.I think he wrote it from the perspective of an angel in love p in which the angel is completely gaga over the woman and feeling things he's never felt before but at the same time wanting to keep it private because he's afraid that if it becomes of the material world then it will lose it's purity. It's a love song about the conflict between what your heart is urging you to do and what your head is telling you is the mart thing to do. I watched the Go Go dolls on VHF talking about this song and what it meant.They said they watched the film ‘City of Angels† and that the song is about an angel who falls for a mo rtal woman. Which is why it says â€Å"I'd give up forever to touch you†, â€Å"you're the closest to heaven that I've ever been† â€Å"and to bleed Just to know you're alive†. He wants to be with her and gives up an eternity in heaven Just to spend a moment with a woman he fell in love with.Like the song because it helps me through through hard times sometimes Just slightly easing the pain and Just let me ponder about things. I do have a particular connection to it because it explains some of my feelings like â€Å"you bleed Just to know you're alive† and â€Å"when everything meant to be broken† sometimes people go through hardships in life, sometimes very small and stupid things that change your perspective in the way you see and experience things. It makes me feel sad moieties.It makes me feel like I'm not the only person that is going through hard times. I actually mostly listen to the cover of this song that is played and sung by Sleeping Wit h Sirens. Keeling (the guy who is from Sleeping With Sirens that sings it) has a very sweet voice that kind of lulls you to sleep when you listen to him. It makes me think of things going on in my life and how it relates to the lyrics. I would choose to listen to this song when I'm feeling down. Like I said before makes me think like I'm not the only person in the world who is going through hardships.

The Welsh Health Survey Health And Social Care Essay

The study was based on a representative sample of local people populating in private families in Wales. A random sample of references from the Postcode Address File ( PAF ) was selected and the sample was stratified by local authorization. Data was collected at two degrees: family ( through a short interview with respondents ) and single ( through self-completion questionnaire ) . The consequences reflect people & A ; acirc ; ˆâ„ ¢s ain apprehension of their wellness instead than a clinical appraisal of their medical status, and their ain reading of the wellness services they have used.Major Highlights of the information is given below: –Socio-economic and personal information about respondents: –Researcher has done statistical analysis of the information and has calculated mean, standard divergence of individual consecutive figure and family consecutive figure every bit good. In the lodging term of office 75.6 % respondents belong to the class of proprietor resident, 14.7 % are on societal leasing whereas merely 9.7 % are on private rental. In the above study employment informations of respondents besides taken as bulk 41.3 % are engaged in everyday and manual businesss, 35.7 % have their managerial and professional business where as 20.4 % respondents have their intermediate business and minority 2.6 % have ne'er worked and they are in long term unemployment. Among the respondents the ratio of female was high as it was 53.6 where as the ratio for male respondent was merely 46.4 % . As it was the study for grownups so 75+ old ages old respondents was being merged. The information depicts that the age group start from 16 old ages old and covers the respondents age of 75+ it covers the every age group of grownups. There was no biasness with the age. The study was non stick to the peculiar age group. Data depicts the economic position of respondents which reflects that 47.8 % are in employment, 2.2 % are unemployed and half of the entire figure i. e 50 % respondents are economically inactive. Data sing the making of respondents shows that 17.6 % are degree qualified. 54.8 % have other makings apart from degree classs whereas 27.6 % are disqualified.Health position, unwellnesss and other conditions:41.6 % reported that they are non suffered from corpulence and fleshiness where as 58.4 % which is more than half they suffered from it. Merely 2.7 % respondents reported that they had of all time stroke, 22.3 % answered that they presently being treated for high blood force per unit area, 10.7 % for asthma, 14.4 % for a respiratory unwellness, 11.4 % for other chronic unwellness, 14.8 % for arthritis, 5.5 % for seeing job, 10.7 % for a mental unwellness, 9.5 % for a bosom status, and 6.9 % for diabetes. 29.1 % of respondents reported that they are holding a restricting long-run unwellness.Health-related life style:21.9 % respondents reported that they are presently smoked. 19.9.0 % of respondents non-smokers reported being on a regular basis exposed to other people ‘s baccy smoke indoors. 8.2 % answered that they drink about every twenty-four hours. 35.4 % of grownups reported eating five or more parts of fruit and vegetables the old twenty-four hours. 29.3 % reported run intoing the guidelines for physical activity in the past hebdomad.Health service usage:17.62 % of respondents reported that they had talked to a GP about their ain wellness in the past two hebdomads where as 82.4 % respondents did non talked to a GP in past two hebdomads. 83.8 % of grownups reported that they have non attended casualty in the last 12 months whereas 16.2 % respondents have attended the same. 33.6 % of grownups reported go toing a hospital outpatient section in the past 12 months, and 9.9 % respondents answered that they have stayed in infirmary as an inmate ( nightlong or longer ) . 69.9 % of grownups reported that they have used a tooth doctor in the past 12 months, 70.1 % a druggist and 49.9 % an optician. 55.1 % respondents reported that they are taking regular prescribed medicine.Strengths of informations: –The information was really elaborate information to cognize the wellness position of people populating in Waless because it was based on holistic attack which was related to other wellness issues as good. The gathered information was unbiased. The study involves people irrespective of their age groups, local life country and gender. The study was done successful as it is utile in many ways which highlights the existent state of affairs of wellness related issues of local people. Through this findings policy shapers, research workers and other stakeholders can reexamine and supervise bing wellness policies and do new schemes and can develop new policies for their improvement. This information provides a direct engagement and demand of NHS to supply wellness attention installations to the people in their countries. The study provides an chance to do an effectual coaction among different stakeholders in civil society and local authorization so that authorities can do new schemes to filtrating the policies for people wellness well- being.Failing of informations: –Information which was collected sing restricting long term unwellness, non stipulating whether or non the unwellness was treated or non. Adult respondents were classified as holding any bosom status if they reported of all time holding been treated for a bosom onslaught or presently being treated for angina, bosom failure or ‘another bosom status ‘ . Consequences for high blood force per unit area ( high blood pressure ) are besides shown, but are normally shown individually from bosom conditions because high blood force per unit area is a hazard factor for bosom disease instead than an existent bosom status. Adult respondents were asked whether they were presently being treated for diabetes, doing no differentiation between type 1 and type 2 diabetes. If they responded positively, they were asked how their diabetes was controlled ( by injection, tablets or diet ) . Respondents were asked whether they had any trouble with their hearing, without a hearing assistance if they normally wore one. If they answered yes, they were asked about the usage and effectivity of hearing AIDSs.Analysis and reading of Datas: –The information shows that 5.5 % of grownups reported holding trouble with their seeing. Table 1.1 shows that were droop addition in the per centum who reported that they holding trouble with their seeing and these respondents are belongs to peculiarly age group of 75 old ages or over this. Besides the job of eyesight exists in particularly older adult females which could be because of age factor. Data depicts that 14.4 % of grownups reported being treated for any respiratory unwellness. Around 10.7 % of respondents reported that they are presently being treated for asthma. Table 1.2 shows that the per centum of job of respiratory unwellness is increasing by age. We can see that of entire answering adult females respondents are more being treated for a respiratory unwellness in comparing to male respondents. We can analyse from the informations that 10.7 % of grownups are being treated for mental unwellness. Among them maximal respondents are being treated for depression. If we do compare the mental unwellness from age than we can state that harmonizing to the informations mental unwellness is increasing among respondents towards the in-between age before come ining in the retirement age. Besides per centum of mental unwellness is higher among female as compared to male respondents. Data shows that figure of per centum of respondents who reported that they of all time holding been treated for a shot. We can analyse that the jobs of shot is increasing with age. In this variable besides we have found that overall Numberss of female respondents are higher in comparing to male respondents. As per the information job of arthritis is quickly turning with the age. We have analyzed that 5.5 % of grownups reported holding trouble with their hearing. Table 1.3 shows that the job of hearing exists to those who are aged 65 old ages. Besides the ratio of male respondents who have reported trouble in hearing i.e. higher than the females. Decision: – After analysis the whole information we can state that there is demand to carry on farther research studies in the same field. As this was the study based on the foregrounding the cardinal wellness issues of people in Waless. Though the study has been conducted successfully nevertheless there is demand to analyze or research the wellness facet with deepness research based on one to one detailed interviews besides the ratio and figure of instances of diseases can be compared in the last few old ages. So that the reappraisal of bing policies can be done and new schemes can border or develop for supplying the better wellness attention installations to the people.

The Health Care Industry Among The United States - 1318 Words

Universities stemmed some of the biggest medical advances in the health care industry amongst the world. The educational platform for the United States spells long term success for health care, by growing the next generation of top health care providers. In comparison Germany and Canada also are represented amongst the top 50 medical schools in the world, but lack any representation of the top 10 prestige rankings. On top of that, both other countries lack volume and opportunity to receive a valued medical education when compared to the United States. This is a big advantage for health care administrators in the Unites States, by getting choice of some of the best and brightest health care professionals of the future. This alone gives them an advantage to attract patients from all locations to receive top quality health procedures. World renowned physicians give great publicity to organizations which usually translate into a large amount of donations towards medical science and techn ology. This leads to increased ability to recruit top medical professionals and be on the forefront of innovation. Third party payers benefit from inflation of costs, because increased demand on services from the top physicians. This allows them to create prestige tiers for insurance costs because of the quality of the service Building off the increased ability of recruiting health professional comes even more heightened salary comparison. In a study conducted with many countries,Show MoreRelatedThe Concept Of Universal Health Care Started In Europe1230 Words   |  5 Pagesconcept of universal health care started in Europe in the late 1800s. Starting in Germany, compulsory sickness insurance originated to protect against wage loss, maintain income stability for workers and gain political favor. Soon after, other European countries followed with their own versions of national health insurance. In the United States, the federal government left health insurance matters to the States up until the early 20th century. The States, in turn, left health insurance up to privateRead MoreThe Obesity Epidemic Is Disturbing The Financial And Social Stability Of The United States1481 Words   |  6 Pagesdisturbing the financial and social stability of the United States. As stated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services â€Å"our modern environment has allowed these conditions to increase at alarming rates and become highly pressing health problems for our nationâ€Å"(U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). Efforts made by authority figures have been enforced to solve this severe crisis. Obesity has become a concerning problem in the United States. This epidemic is interfering with the successRead MoreHealth Care Research Paper1030 Words   |  5 PagesCurrently Health Care in the United States is going through a lot of changes and controversies. With a new presi dency in the white house that wants to replace the Affordable Care act and eliminate it the future is very uncertain (Boerner, 2017). People are either against this decision that can dramatically change the whole market place including Medicaid and Medicare or they are in favor. Reversing the ACA will reduce increase the number of uninsured patients in the country and this means that evenRead MoreFuture Challenges Facing Healthcare in the United States1306 Words   |  5 PagesFuture Challenges Facing Health Care in the United States Issues affecting Health care in the United States The United States Health Care issue has been a challenge that many have given their opinions from different positions within the society in their attempt to come up with the most appropriate measures to tackle the Health Care Challenges facing the Nation. An efficient, affordable and accessible health care program is the most important issue which should be prioritized for a healthy nationRead MoreChanging The Landscape Of Health Care Essay959 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿ Altering the Landscape of Health Care Beverly L. Rivera HCS/490 October 15, 2014 Joseph N. Atkins Altering the Landscape of Health Care The health care field is one of the fastest growing industries in the United States and other countries. The scope of changes suggests a consumer-driven environment and moving away from a provider-driven industry. Changes in technology and communication methods are allowing people to engage directly with their health care provider and not rely solely on theRead MoreThe Future of US Healthcare System1287 Words   |  5 PagesThe Future of US Health Care System: The American health care system is considered as the most competitive, inefficient, heterogeneous, and advanced care system across the globe. This is despite of the increased government expenditures on this sector and numerous initiatives to reform health care to enhance its efficiency while improving patient outcomes. Numerous concerns regarding the efficiency of the health sector in the United States has been fueled by the dissatisfaction among Americans regardingRead MoreThe Health Care Of Healthcare1339 Words   |  6 Pagesnations, thirty-two have universal health care, with the United States being the exception. A big question has been why does this nation’s healthcare cost so much, but the American people are not seeing their investment go to effective use. In healthcare economics, there are three medical stools: cost, access, and quality. The concept of the three medical stool is, they has to be a tradeoff. For example, if the United States would to improve the cost of health insurance, so everyone could affordRead MoreHealthcare And Health Care Industry824 Words   |  4 Pagesthe past few decades health care industry in United States is facing three major problems related to quality, costs and access. The health care expenditure in United States has increasing drastically over the years and United states still ranks top in health care spending when compared to other top nations in the world. Despite of having high health care expenditure, Americans have limited access to health care, spends higher costs for the procedures and getting poor health care outcomes. In a recentRead MoreThe Need for a National Health Care Plan1023 Words   |  5 PagesThe Need for a National Health Care Plan in the United States Working in the health care industry for the past thirty years has permitted me to gain first hand, up close and personal knowledge of the health care system in our country. Dealing with the facets of humanity over the past ten years who have no health care coverage, or those who are aided by the state in which they live has led me to form a definite opinion’s about the necessity for a national health care plan. My thought process aboutRead MoreObservations And Reflections On The Us Health Care System1351 Words   |  6 PagesObservations and reflections on the US health care system, some worrying trends observed in recent years, as well as the observations made in the course of practical work in health care have led to my decision to write to you. Among people without health care in our country, about 88% of the work, but many do not earn enough to pay for private health insurance (DeNavas-Walt, Proctor, and Smith, 2011). At the same time they cannot get government insurance for the poor because their income is higher